previous next

[44] θαμι_Ναί, though unusual, seems established; cf. Nicand. Ther. 239αἱ δὲ θαμιναί” (“χαμηλαί” one MS.), and “θαμειναί” is recognised by Choeroboscus ap. Cramer An. Ox. ii. 180. So “ὑδατι_νούςMatro 79, “ὑδατειναί” Hippocr. Acr. c. 15, 19. Ruhnken, who defended the word, quoted forms in “-ρινος, ὀπωρινός” etc. See Schulze Q. E. p. 253.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.

An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.

hide Display Preferences
Greek Display:
Arabic Display:
View by Default:
Browse Bar: