ἐξαίφνης δὲ
κτλ. Cp. the “sudden” tumultuous
entrance of Alcibiades (212 C καὶ ἐξαίφνης κτλ.).
The incursion here is devised in order to save the situation. For the sake of artistic
effect, the series of λόγοι must now stop: the climax
having been reached in the encomium of Socr. by Alcib., to add a eulogy of any lesser
personage would be bathos.
ἐξιόντος τινὸς
κτλ. Hommel comments: “imaginem proponit
comissatorum contra nitente eo, qui iam exiturus erat, aditum vi
expugnantium.” But, as Rettig remarks, there is no hint in the text of vis or of nisus. The words ἐξιόντος τινὸς are merely put in to explain how it was
that they found the doors open. εἰς τὸ ἄντικρυς is
connected by Hommel and Stallb.^{2} with ἐξιόντος,
but by Rückert, Ast and Stallb.^{1} with πορεύεσθαι: the former view is preferable.
Ἐρυξίμαχον. Eryx. and Phaedrus are
represented throughout as “hunting in couples”; and it is
characteristic of the former, as an authority on health, and of the latter, as a
valetudinarian, that they should be the first to escape from the scene of θόρυβος and παμπολὺς
οἶνος: cp. 176 B ff., 214 A ff.
This text is part of:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.