[3]
Sometimes proposition is highly advantageous, more
especially when the fact cannot be defended and
the question turns on the definition of the fact;
as for example in the case of the man who has taken
the money of a private individual from a temple: we
shall say, “My client is charged with sacrilege. It
is for you to decide whether it was sacrilege,” so
that the judge may understand that his sole duty is
to decide whether the charge is tantamount to
sacrilege.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.