[17]
For example,
this made it necessary for Cicero to digress even in
the exordium when he was defending Milo, as is
clear from the short speech1 which he made on
that occasion. But the orator who makes some
preface to the main question or proposes to
follow up his proofs with a passage designed to
commend them to the jury, may digress at some
length. On the other hand, if he breaks as say in
the middle of his speech, he should not be long in
returning to the point from which he departed.
IV. After the statement of facts some place the
proposition2 which they regard as forming a division
of a forensic speech. I have already expressed
my opinion of this view.3 But it seems to me
that the beginning of every proof is a proposition,
such as often occurs in the demonstration of the
main question and sometimes even in the enunciation
of individual arguments, more especially of those
which are called ἐπιχειρήματα4 But for the moment
I shall speak of the first kind. It is not always necessary to employ it.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.