This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
“What, then, really is Being? It is that which is
eternal, without beginning and without end, to which
no length of time brings change. For time is something that is in motion, appearing in connexion with
moving matter, ever flowing, retaining nothing, a
receptacle, as it were, of birth and decay, whose
familiar ‘afterwards’ and ‘before,’ ‘shall be’ and
‘has been,’ when they are uttered, are of themselves
a confession of Not Being. For to speak of that which
has not yet occurred in terms of Being, or to say of
what has already ceased to be, that it is, is silly and
absurd. And as for that on which we most rely to
[p. 245]
support our conception of time, as we utter the words,
‘it is here,’ ‘it is at hand,’ and ‘now’ — all this again
reason, entering in, demolishes utterly. For ‘now’ is
crowded out into the future and the past, when we
would look upon it as a culmination ; for of necessity it
suffers division. And if Nature, when it is measured,
is subject to the same processes as is the agent that
measures it, then there is nothing in Nature that has
permanence or even existence, but all things are in the
process of creation or destruction according to their
relative distribution with respect to time. Wherefore
it is irreverent in the case of that which is to say even
that it was or shall be; for these are certain deviations, transitions, and alterations, belonging to that
which by its nature has no permanence in Being.