7.
[13]
I say that so numerous a meeting of the college has never decided on any
subject, not even concerning the rights or life of a vestal virgin, ever
since the establishment of sacred ceremonies, though their antiquity is the
same as that of the city itself; although when an investigation into any
crime is taking place it is of consequence that as many as possible should
be present. For the interpretation of a law given by the priests is on such
a footing that it has the same force as a decision of the judges. An
explanation of what is required by religion can be properly given by one
single experienced priest; but in a case of a trial for life, such a
proceeding would be harsh and unjust. Nevertheless, you will find this to be
the case, that a greater number of pontiffs were assembled when they decided
on the question concerning my house, than had ever met on any question
concerning the ceremonies of the vestal virgins. The next day the senate in
a very full house, when you, O Lentulus, being the consul elect, made the
motion, and Publius Lentulus and Quintus Metellus, the consuls, put it to
the senate, when all the pontiffs who belonged to this order were present
and when those who had precedence, from the distinctions which had been
conferred on them by the Roman people, had made many speeches concerning the
decision of the college, and when all of them had assisted in drawing up the
decree,—the senate, I say, voted that my house appeared, according
to the decision of the pontiffs, to be free from all religious
liability.
[14]
Is this then the place
which of all others the soothsayers appear to intend to speak of as sacred,
which is the only one of all private buildings in the whole city which has
this argument to advance in support of its rights, that it has been adjudged
not to be sacred by those very men who preside over all sacred things?
However, refer the matter to them, as you are bound to do
according to the resolution of the senate. Either the investigation will be
allotted to you who were the first to pronounce an opinion respecting this
house, and who have pronounced it free from all religious liability; or the
senate itself will decide, which has already decided in the fullest possible
house, that one single priest alone dissenting; or else, what will certainly
be done, it will be referred back to the pontiffs, to whose authority,
integrity, and prudence our ancestors entrusted all sacred and religious
observances, whether private or public. What then can these men decide
different from what they have already decided? There are many houses in this
city, O conscript fathers; I do not know whether they are not nearly all
held by thoroughly good titles, but still they are only private titles,
titles derived from inheritance, from prescription, from purchase, or from
mortgage. But I assert that there is no other house whatever equally fenced
round by private title and incontestable rights, and at the same time by
every sort of public law of the highest authority, both human and divine.
[15]
For in the first place it was built
by the authority of the senate, with the public money; and in the second
place it has been fenced round and fortified against the impious violence of
this gladiator by numerous resolutions of the senate.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.