Ptolemy Soter saw in a dream the colossal
statue of Pluto in Sinope, not knowing nor having
ever seen how it looked, and in his dream the statue
bade him convey it with all speed to Alexandria. He
had no information and no means of knowing where
the statue was situated, but as he related the vision
to his friends there was discovered for him a much
travelled man by the name of Sosibius, who said that
[p. 69]
he had seen in Sinopê just such a great statue as
the king thought he saw. Ptolemy, therefore, sent
Soteles and Dionysius, who, after a considerable time
and with great difficulty, and not without the help of
divine providence, succeeded in stealing the statue and
bringing it away.1 When it had been conveyed to
Egypt and exposed to view, Timotheus, the expositor
of sacred law, and Manetho of Sebennytus, and their
associates, conjectured that it was the statue of
Pluto, basing their conjecture on the Cerberus and
the serpent with it, and they convinced Ptolemy that
it was the statue of none other of the gods but Serapis.
It certainly did not bear this name when it came from
Sinope, but, after it had been conveyed to Alexandria,
it took to itself the name which Pluto bears among
the Egyptians, that of Serapis. Moreover, since
Heracleitus2 the physical philosopher says, ‘The
same are Hades and Dionysus, to honour whom they
rage and rave,’ people are inclined to come to this
opinion. In fact, those who insist that the body is
called Hades, since the soul is, as it were, deranged
and inebriate when it is in the body, are too frivolous
in their use of allegory. It is better to identify
Osiris with Dionysus3 and Serapis with Osiris,4 who
received this appellation at the time when he changed
his nature. For this reason Serapis is a god of all
peoples in common, even as Osiris is ; and this they
who have participated in the holy rites well know.
[p. 71]
1 Cf. Moralia, 984 a; Tacitus, Histories, iv. 83-84, who tells the story more dramatically and with more detail; Clement of Alexandria, Protrepticus, iv. 48 (p. 42 Potter); Origen, Against Celsus, v. 38.
2 Cf. Diels, Frag. der Vorsokratiker, i. 81, Heracleitus no. 14.
3 Cf. 356 b, supra, and 364 d, infra.
4 Cf. 376 a, infra, and Pauly-Wissowa, s.v. Sarapis (vol. i. a, col. 2394).