This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
Table of Contents:
![>](/img/east.gif)
![view as XML](/img/xml.gif)
2.
But to send ambassadors to a man respecting whom you passed a most dignified and
severe decision only thirteen days ago, is not an act of lenity, but, if I am to
speak my real opinion, of downright madness. In the first place, you praised
those generals who, of their own head, had undertaken war against him; in the
next place, you praised the veterans who, though they had been settled in those
colonies by Antonius, preferred the liberty of the Roman people to the
obligations which they were under to him.
[4]
Is
it not so? Why was the Martial legion? why was the fourth legion praised? For if
they have deserted the consul, they ought to be blamed; if they have abandoned
an enemy to the republic, then they are deservedly praised.
But as at that time you had not yet got any consuls, you passed a decree that a
motion concerning the rewards for the soldiers and the honors to be conferred on
the generals should be submitted to you at the earliest opportunity. Are you
then going now to arrange rewards for those men who have taken arms against
Antonius, and to send ambassadors to Antonius? so as to deserve to be ashamed
that the legions should have come to more honorable resolutions than the senate:
if, indeed, the legions have resolved to defend the senate against Antonius, but
the senate decrees to send ambassadors to Antonius. Is this encouraging the
spirit of the soldiers, or damping their virtue?
[5]
This is what we have gained in the last twelve days, that the man whom no single
person except Cotyla was then found to defend, has now advocates, even of
consular rank. Would that they had all been asked their opinion before me
(although I have my suspicions as to what some of those men who will be asked
after me, are intending to say); I should find it easier to speak against them
if any argument appeared to have been advanced.
For there is an opinion in some quarters, that some one intends to propose to
decree Antonius that farther Gaul,
which Plancus is at present in possession of. What else is that but supplying an
enemy with all the arms necessary for civil war: first of all with the sinews of
war, money in abundance, of which he is at present destitute; and secondly, with
as much cavalry as he pleases? Cavalry do I say? He is a likely man to hesitate,
I suppose, to bring with him the barbarian nations;—a man who does not
see this is senseless; he who does see it, and still advocates such a measure,
is impious.
[6]
Will you furnish a wicked and
desperate citizen with an army of Gauls and Germans, with money, and infantry,
and cavalry, and all sorts of resources? All these excuses are no excuse at
all:—“He is a friend of mine.” Let him first be a
friend of his country:—“ He is a relation of
mine.” Can any relationship be nearer than that of one's country, in
which even one's parents are comprised? “He has given me
money:”—I should like to see the man who will dare to say
that. But when I have explained what is the real object aimed at, it will be
easy for you to decide which opinion you ought to agree with and adopt.
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.