[34]
Is not this case very like that speech and action of
Fimbria? You are accusing Sextus Roscius. Why so? Because he escaped out of your hands;
because he did not allow himself to be murdered. The one action, because it was done
against Scaevola, appears scandalous; this one, because it is done by Chrysogonus, is
intolerable. For, in the name of the immortal gods, what is there in this cause that
requires a defence? What topic is there requiring the ability of an advocate, or even
very much needing eloquence of speech? Let us, O judges, unfold the whole case, and when
it is set before our eyes, let us consider it; by this means you will easily understand
on what the whole case turns, and on what matters I ought to dwell, and what decision
you ought to come to.
This text is part of:
Search the Perseus Catalog for:
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License.
An XML version of this text is available for download, with the additional restriction that you offer Perseus any modifications you make. Perseus provides credit for all accepted changes, storing new additions in a versioning system.