hide Matching Documents

The documents where this entity occurs most often are shown below. Click on a document to open it.

Document Max. Freq Min. Freq
The Atlanta (Georgia) Campaign: May 1 - September 8, 1864., Part I: General Report. (ed. Maj. George B. Davis, Mr. Leslie J. Perry, Mr. Joseph W. Kirkley) 1,463 127 Browse Search
Frederick H. Dyer, Compendium of the War of the Rebellion: Regimental Histories 1,378 372 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 9. (ed. Frank Moore) 810 42 Browse Search
John Bell Hood., Advance and Retreat: Personal Experiences in the United States and Confederate Armies 606 8 Browse Search
Rebellion Record: a Diary of American Events: Documents and Narratives, Volume 11. (ed. Frank Moore) 565 25 Browse Search
William Tecumseh Sherman, Memoirs of General William T. Sherman . 473 17 Browse Search
The Photographic History of The Civil War: in ten volumes, Thousands of Scenes Photographed 1861-65, with Text by many Special Authorities, Volume 3: The Decisive Battles. (ed. Francis Trevelyan Miller) 373 5 Browse Search
Robert Underwood Johnson, Clarence Clough Buell, Battles and Leaders of the Civil War. Volume 4. 372 0 Browse Search
Benson J. Lossing, Pictorial Field Book of the Civil War. Volume 3. 277 1 Browse Search
William F. Fox, Lt. Col. U. S. V., Regimental Losses in the American Civil War, 1861-1865: A Treatise on the extent and nature of the mortuary losses in the Union regiments, with full and exhaustive statistics compiled from the official records on file in the state military bureaus and at Washington 232 78 Browse Search
View all matching documents...

Browsing named entities in Adam Badeau, Military history of Ulysses S. Grant from April 1861 to April 1865. Volume 3. You can also browse the collection for Atlanta (Georgia, United States) or search for Atlanta (Georgia, United States) in all documents.

Your search returned 88 results in 10 document sections:

Adam Badeau, Military history of Ulysses S. Grant from April 1861 to April 1865. Volume 3, Chapter 25: (search)
Chapter 25: General view of situation after fall of Atlanta defences of Richmond and Petersburg national entrenchments depression of public spirit atan Early abandons the Valley censures of Lee disappointment in Richmond. Atlanta had fallen, the Weldon road was carried, and Early's exit from the Valley had plans to the actual emergencies. On the 8th of September, Sherman had entered Atlanta in person, and on the 10th, he was instructed: As soon as your men are sufficiare that the right man for commander-in-chief was the general who had captured Atlanta, not the one who still lay outside of Richmond. Until the fall of Atlanta, Atlanta, indeed, the gloom at the North was overshadowing. The most hopeful had become weary, the most determined were depressed and disappointed. It was forgotten that Graloudest were laggard in action. But above all, at this crisis, the victory of Atlanta revived the drooping spirits of the nation and gave stamina to the government;
Adam Badeau, Military history of Ulysses S. Grant from April 1861 to April 1865. Volume 3, Chapter 26: (search)
ler had been sent to cut the railroad between Atlanta and Chattanooga, and on the 13th of August, Sod to send Gordon Granger past Mobile towards Atlanta. . . . The movement Sherman is now making, reuld risk our whole army by going too far from Atlanta. Both generals were thus in favor of Sherman Palmetto station, he publicly announced that Atlanta was to be recovered; that Forrest was alreadyn to come to Nashville, and for me to destroy Atlanta, and then march across Georgia to Savannah oremorable march. This was to give up not only Atlanta, but the line in the rear to Chattanooga; to n at once ordered the Twentieth corps to hold Atlanta, and moved himself with the remainder of his en that as soon as Sherman took possession of Atlanta, the general-in-chief proposed that he shouldckworth, and I was forced to follow. I hold Atlanta with the Twentieth corps, and have strong detn did conceive his peculiar march, destroying Atlanta as Cortez burnt his ships, and abandoning the[17 more...]
Adam Badeau, Military history of Ulysses S. Grant from April 1861 to April 1865. Volume 3, Chapter 27: (search)
the Roman yoke, they decried the civilization of their victors; and the Romans, in their turn, severely disapproved the proceedings of those whom, two thousand years ago, they called Northern barbarians. But, as Sherman told the inhabitants of Atlanta, when he expelled them from their homes: War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it. It was the men who brought these evils on themselves who were responsible .for all the terrible results of their crime. The national commanders were no more ansTo many this task would have been more unacceptable because, while the chief was lying comparatively inactive in front of Richmond, the subordinates were fighting important battles and winning brilliant victories elsewhere. Sherman had captured Atlanta, and Sheridan had overrun the Valley, while Thomas was entrusted with a command where the mightiest issues were at stake; and the interest of the country was transferred from the commander of them all to the great soldiers so rapidly rising into
Adam Badeau, Military history of Ulysses S. Grant from April 1861 to April 1865. Volume 3, Chapter 28: (search)
d. With the long line of railroad in rear of Atlanta, Sherman cannot maintain his position. If heogether failed to make him let go his hold of Atlanta, but had demonstrated their ability at all ti Destroy in such case all military stores at Atlanta. On the 21st, he said to Halleck: The stores I can do, and shall therefore, when I get to Atlanta the necessary stores, move south as soon as pof cavalry, were stretched along from Rome to Atlanta. The railroad and telegraph lines had been rat. But this would involve the abandonment of Atlanta and a retrograde movement, which would be of great achievement for him to make me abandon Atlanta, by mere threats or manoeuvres. But by farof the main rebel army in the neighborhood of Atlanta. He announced his arrival to Grant, and fromroy all the road below Chattanooga, including Atlanta, and make for the sea-coast. In that event Iardor which characterized the assaults before Atlanta. If his strategy was still bold, his tactics[8 more...]
Adam Badeau, Military history of Ulysses S. Grant from April 1861 to April 1865. Volume 3, Chapter 29: (search)
is plans. On the 16th of November, Sherman marched out of Atlanta, and the same day Beauregard telegraphed the news to Richmond: Sherman is about to move with three corps from Atlanta to Augusta, or Macon, thence probably to Charleston or Savannah, n as the army was heard from on the coast. Since you left Atlanta, he said, no very great progress has been made here. The om East to West, possessed by the enemy before the fall of Atlanta. This condition will be filled by holding Savannah and Aue great campaigns of Grant and Sherman for Chattanooga and Atlanta. The national troops were held in Nashville, and communicf the army of the Military Division of the Mississippi on Atlanta, from the commencement of the campaign till its close, andgn avowedly was, either to force Sherman to fall back from Atlanta to Chattanooga, or, failing in this, to crush the force th displayed the daring which distinguished him in front of Atlanta, or which apparently inspired the conception of this very
Adam Badeau, Military history of Ulysses S. Grant from April 1861 to April 1865. Volume 3, Chapter 30: (search)
Chapter 30: Sherman moves from Atlanta object of Sherman's march character of march e foundries, machine-shops, and warehouses in Atlanta were now destroyed, and on the morning of Novis the capital of the state, and distant from Atlanta about a hundred miles. The time allowed for esent word to Richmond that Sherman had burned Atlanta, and was marching in the direction of Macon. n of all arms along the line of railroad from Atlanta to Augusta was reported, and Hardee declared:ovisions. Two-thirds of the distance between Atlanta and the sea had been traversed. At Millen und fresh earthworks, the first since leaving Atlanta; but the rebel commander doubtless perceived ust one month since the army had started from Atlanta. On the 12th of November, Sherman severed co II., p. 220. I only regarded the march from Atlanta to Savannah as a shift of base, as the transy. To oppose the advance of the enemy from Atlanta, the state of Georgia would thus have probabl
Adam Badeau, Military history of Ulysses S. Grant from April 1861 to April 1865. Volume 3, Chapter 31: (search)
nly will compel Lee to detach from Richmond, or give us nearly the entire South. Sherman, however, did not capture the garrison of Savannah, and therefore, as at Atlanta, an important force remained in his front after the technical objective point was gained. This fact also materially modified the plans of the general-in-chief. armies; for not only the fragments of Hood's command, and the garrison of Savannah, and all the movable forces which had been unable to withstand the advance from Atlanta, were certain to be in his path, but Lee himself with the army of Northern Virginia might combine with these to destroy him. In his former march he had advanced tes a day, and resting ten days on the road. When Goldsboro was reached the army was in superb order, and the teams were almost as fresh as when they started from Atlanta. Schofield, we have seen, was at Goldsboro when Sherman arrived. Immediately after the capture of Wilmington, he had begun his preparations to move to the int
Adam Badeau, Military history of Ulysses S. Grant from April 1861 to April 1865. Volume 3, Chapter 35: (search)
rove hard to appease it, and to bring about amicable relations between two men so signally important to their country as the great War Minister and the soldier of Atlanta and the March. But it was long before the sense of injustice which Sherman felt could be allayed. Some very interesting letters on this subject, which I am alwas to hold Lee in Richmond, and to sweep all the other rebel forces towards the same point with his wide, encompassing command. In September, Sherman captured Atlanta, but he still had the army of Hood to contend with; and although he had won a victory, as yet reaped none of its results. On the contrary, by the advance of Hood he was speedily placed in a more precarious position than before Atlanta fell. But his brilliant strategical genius, just fitted to cope with such emergencies, enabled the great manoeuvrer to extricate himself from his difficulties and to reverse the situation, himself threatening rebel lines and attacking rebel rears. About
Adam Badeau, Military history of Ulysses S. Grant from April 1861 to April 1865. Volume 3, Appendix to Chapter XXVIII. (search)
Appendix to Chapter XXVIII. General Halleck to General Grant. Washington, D. C., October 2, 1864. Lieutenant-General Grant, City Point: General: Some time since General Sherman asked my opinion in regard to his operations after the capture of Atlanta. While free to give advice to the best of my ability, I felt it my duty to refer him to you for instructions, not being advised of your views on that subject. I presume, from his dispatches, that you have corresponded upon the subject, and perhaps his plan of future operations has already been decided upon. At one time he seemed most decidedly of opinion that he ought to operate by Montgomery and Selma, and connect himself with Canby and Farragut on the Alabama river, thus severing the northern part of Georgia and Alabama, and almost Mississippi, from the rebel confederacy. This view was taken in his letters to General Canby, copies of which were sent to the Adjutant-General's office, and in his opinion I fully concurr
Adam Badeau, Military history of Ulysses S. Grant from April 1861 to April 1865. Volume 3, Index (search)
apture of, by Forrest, III., 57, 152, 181. Atlanta, objective point of Sherman, II., 35, 533; ca-501. Georgia, situation in, after fall of Atlanta III., 40; Sherman's plan for marching throughry against Sherman's rear, 544; evacuation of Atlanta, 546; sends Wheeler to cut Atlanta and Chatta Kilpatrick, General, Judson, sent south of Atlanta, II. 544; in command of cavalry in Sherman's crosses Chattahoochee river, 539; in front of Atlanta, 543; repulse of Hood, 544; besieges Atlanta,Atlanta, 542-546; situation in Georgia, III., 41-43; discussion of new campaign with Grant, 43, 45, 48, 53,2; relations with Thomas, 153, 155; return to Atlanta, 164-166, 173, 174; march to the sea, 282-300 Slocum, General II. W., takes possession of Atlanta, II., 546; in command of Sherman's left wing man, General, George, captured by rebels near Atlanta, II., 543; at Louisville, III., 191; delay ofnd, under Sherman, II., 533; campaign against Atlanta, 534-540, 542-545; campaign of, in Tennessee,